🔗 Share this article

In a significant regulatory appeal, a national review panel has reversed a prior decision that blocked viewers in Australia from seeing video footage of the shooting incident involving conservative commentator Charlie Kirk. This challenge was lodged by Elon Musk's social media platform, which contested an directive sought by the national eSafety commissioner.

Details of the Original Classification Ruling

After the fatal shooting of Charlie Kirk at Utah Valley University in September, the regulator applied to the classification board to officially classify the available footage. The board initially ruled the content was "refused classification", a rating that empowered the commissioner to instruct social media companies to restrict access to the videos for users in Australia.

Elon Musk's company challenged the decision for a pair of videos depicting the Kirk incident. Additionally, it contested a comparable ban on another piece of footage—showing the assault of Iryna Zarutska on a North Carolina train—which had likewise been classified as "refused classification".

Arguments Presented and Board's Decision

In its appeal, X contended that the Kirk video contained only brief violence with no visible weapon. The company noted the footage was grainy and the focus shifted rapidly from the individual to the surrounding crowd.

X maintained the footage was not overly graphic, exploitative, or offensive, adding that it served as a neutral objective record of "a significant incident of historical and political significance that prompted widespread discussion". X even compared the video and the historic film of the JFK shooting.

Most members of the review board ultimately agreed that, "despite the terrible nature of the event," the content did not reach a level that was gratuitous, exploitative or offensive enough to warrant a 'refused classification' rating. The board suggested that a more detailed depiction with different editing might have resulted in a different ruling. Consequently, the board changed the rating of the content to R18+.

The Minority Opinion

A minority on the panel held a contrary view, arguing the video was "content designed for sharing for the probable aim of entertainment and/or personal gain (such as engagement metrics)". This view stated the parallel with the Zapruder JFK film was invalid, as the Kennedy video was released long after the assassination, "after public sentiment regarding it had calmed".

Reactions to the Decision

Posting on its global government affairs account, the platform welcomed the decision.

"We challenged this case to uphold freedom of expression and the critical nature of public access about matters of public significance. We remain dedicated to safeguarding these principles."

Representatives for the safety regulator also welcomed the board's decision, but noted that the new R18+ rating now means platforms "have obligations to prevent R18+ material is not accessible to users under 18".

Recent Developments on Violent Content

Separately, the regulator has not issued take-down orders to platforms this week regarding graphic footage from the Sydney beach incident circulating on social media. Officials commented that while the content were distressing, they did not reach the required standard for a "refused classification" rating.

Instead, platforms have been instructed to apply sensitive content labels and interstitials, such as obscuring the image, on such content in line with their own content policies.